Yamaha 01v Mixer Compatible With New Os Review
Shall I buy a yamaha 01v96i mixer in 2019?
out of these mixers, i'd certainly would pick the yamaha likewise! - not sure how much i'd still pay for a rather 'old' mixer though...
the somewhat more sophisticated dm1000 (which has no usb only 2 menu slots) has been serving me very well for shut to 20 years now.
(i have been stepping up to a far larger desk though)
Lives for gear
Same here Dave - ProMix01->02R.
Sold the 02R to become ITB and have yet to get things up-and-running again, so the fear's all the same at that place that I might miss it.
Big fan of Yamaha boards 'cause they're robust and fantastic value. Even the connectors **** all over the competition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey Man ➡️
Same here Dave - ProMix01->02R.
Sold the 02R to go ITB and have yet to get things up-and-running again, so the fright's still there that I might miss it.
Big fan of Yamaha boards 'cause they're robust and fantastic value. Even the connectors **** all over the contest.
Man I miss that O2R, when Yam made that it was the best! MPC2000XL and O2R philharmonic, was the dopest. I was killing it with those 2.
Me also, I went ITB, I never idea I would do it. Only when I found out what it was and what got my attention was NO, NOISE FLOOR! I went from All hardware, to Hybrid to ITB, and I am loving it. I dearest being compact. I have to top notch synths and sounds and I am skillful. I get more bang for the buck. I had to leave PT and the Mac alone it was messing me upwards. Ane time back in like 2012 it messed me upwardly so bad I couldn't do music for a month straight! I got rid of all that stuff. Now I am good. Only I miss that O2R,
I just stumbled across this site looking for places to buy a new 01v96i. Similar yous, all paths proceed leading back to this board. In particular, its size, MIDI capabilities, routing flexibility and relatively decent furnishings.
I don't like tracking in DAWs, and find constantly having to battle latency and moving between different mixers for monitoring and recording frustrating. I find it actually hard to believe that mixing and monitoring completely in the box has become an adequate norm, because I find the latency (particularly with headphones) really distracting.
Some of the things that appeals to me still most the 01v96i versus the new generation of digital mixers is: 96khz operation, ample expansion options, and a complete MIDI implementation. All things that are missing from the X32s, QU16s and TF1s of the world.
I say go for it!
Lives for gear
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedyLee ➡️
Some of the things that appeals to me still well-nigh the 01v96i versus the new generation of digital mixers is: 96khz functioning, ample expansion options, and a complete MIDI implementation. All things that are missing from the X32s, QU16s and TF1s of the earth.
I say go for it!
And **Inserts** on every channel!
Last edited by Tezmack; 26th June 2019 at 05:eleven PM.. Reason: Spelling
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tezmack ➡️
Me thinks I will exist having a 01V96i. If only for the Input and Output possibilities as I actually like externals, noise and all. I would like to think Yamaha and Steinberg have done a good job marrying Cubase 10 with the 01V96i and there won't be likewise much latency. Cubase Pro 10 looks like another matter that I will have to go with from Cubase Artist. There seems to be proficient opportunity for external processor intergration here. The Yamaha USB driver was updated in March this year and Yamaha are proudly promoting the 01V96i on the website, even subsequently all these years. I promise the time and effort is worth it and I am not disappointed.
Awesome - personally I retrieve information technology'south a good pick, even later all these years. It'due south really the last digital mixer on the market that is targeted at both alive and studio use, rather than just live use. I feel like a lot of its successors have been dumbed down too - easier to utilise (great for live!), but not so flexible.
The main downside of the 01v96 series has ever been the caput amps, merely it always has ADAT to apply with some nicer converters for more than disquisitional work.
Biggest problem I'thou having at the moment is finding where to buy one - Thomann have them in stock, only won't ship Yamaha gear to my country due to their dealership understanding :(
Gear Bedlamite
Im considering this desk-bound
If I connect my ADAT box to information technology, that would add 8 inputs... but would so have to use the screen to route those to the maximum 16 channels over USB? Basically, i cant have 24 channels over USB?
Quote:
Originally Posted past gypsymoth ➡️
Im considering this desk
If I connect my ADAT box to it, that would add 8 inputs... but would so have to use the screen to route those to the maximum 16 channels over USB? Basically, i cant have 24 channels over USB?
Yamaha 01V96 -
The 01V96 already has one fix of ADAT In and Out ports as standard, so adding a dual-ADAT expander carte means a 24-rails recorder can be accommodated entirely in the digital domain, with the proviso that sample rates of 44.1kHz or 48kHz are used.
I used the original version of the 02R in my ADAT studio open up to the public for about 5 years. Late 90'south early 2000'southward.
By using external preamp going right into the ADAT car I turned into a tracking business firm, but mixing, the O2R lacked the quality I desired.
The best role of the O2R is the speed and simplicity of automatic mixing. Fantastic interface to save and recall automated mix's.
The down side is the preamps are a bit muddy in the mid range, the EQ'southward, compressors, and effects are not the best sounding.
At that time, I had an Allen and Heath mixer that sounded amend for mixing than the O2R.
Take this with a grain of table salt. At the time everything was 18 chip 48K.
The lower end digital mixers offer lot's of bang/buck. But don't fool yourself into thinking it's a lower cost high stop mixer.
I just did my shopping for a new mixer. A good mixer has headroom for +24 inputs. Rather than echo myself, here is a cross ref to another thread.
To Console or Non to Panel...
Become to the superlative of folio 31
Lives for gear
Yeah, Allen & Heath mixers are generally beautifully-built, quiet, accurate, detailed and pretty much pro in every mode.
Can't get wrong with 'em IMHO.
Lives for gear
Gear Head
Just seen this thread. I just picked up the Yamaha 01v96i here in the UK last week brand new for £899 i recall information technology's an amazing mixer, I oasis't even scratched the surface and it'south built similar a tank. Don't know how much these were on release but the toll I paid seemed to be quite a deal.
In that location are 3 still bachelor here if anyone was looking to buy one.
Guitar Guitar Shop link below
https://www.guitarguitar.co.united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland/produ...mixing-panel
Rob
I have the 01V96v2 (non i) -my major disappointment was discovering the 4 Midi Remote Banks are NOT motorised -
the faders neither change to previous values when changing between banks one-4 or reply to incoming midi .
For the Audio modes of the mixer the faders DO as described above .
The advertising seems therefore disingenuous as everything implies the midi control would behave similar to the Sound modes with full motorisation.
Could i version users confirm if they have full motorised Remote Midi Banks control ? maybe it was implemented in the later version.
If not potential buyers should be fabricated aware of this .
(unless my unit is just broken??)
Gear Head
Gear Bedlamite
Last edited by SonicAxiom; 12th April 2021 at 03:59 AM..
Source: https://gearspace.com/board/music-computers/1269777-shall-i-buy-yamaha-01v96i-mixer-2019-a.html
0 Response to "Yamaha 01v Mixer Compatible With New Os Review"
Enregistrer un commentaire